Research opportunities in production engineering: a diagnosis instrument proposal / Oportunidades de pesquisa em engenharia de produção: uma proposta de instrumento de diagnóstico

Authors

  • Isabela Felix Moreira Neves
  • Tassiana Vale D’Elboux
  • Sandra Miranda Neves
  • Emerson José de Paiva
  • Janaina Antonino Pinto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv4n5-214

Keywords:

Production Engineering, Commercial sector, University-Industry relationship, Bibliometrics

Abstract

The University-Industry Relationship presents itself as an important factor for the socio-economic development, whether municipal, regional or national. So the goal of this article is to propose an instrument for the diagnosis of research opportunities in Production Engineering in the commercial sector at the Brazilian city of Itabira (MG). The research method was the theoretic-conceptual, through a bibliometrics analysis, obtained on the basis of Web of Science. Articles were assessed from knowledge areas required by the Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) and published in 2014 and 2015. The diagnostic instrument was drawn up from a bibliometrics analysis and validated by experts’ opinion, professors from Federal University of Itajubá (UNIFEI). A pilot test has also been accomplished with four companies, members of an Association of Itabira. As the main result, the test has indicated that the priority area for research is the Economic Engineering in the commercial sector of Itabira.

References

Abepro – Brazilian Association of Production Engineering. Areas and Subareas of Production Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.abepro.org.br/

Acita – Commercial, Industrial, Services and Agricultural Association of Itabira. (2016). Distribution of Itabira companies by operating sector. Data provided by Acita.

Araújo, W. T., Freira, B. M. J., Autran, M. de M. M., Fernandes, J. C. & Pereira, R. G. (2000). Meta-análise das dissertações do curso de mestrado ciência da informação UFPB: 1990-1999. Revista Informação e Sociedade: estudos. João Pessoa, 10, 1.

Berto, V. S. R. M. & Nakano, D. N. (1998) - Metodologia da Pesquisa e a Engenharia de Produção, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo – Departamento de Engenharia de Produção. Retrieved from http://www.abepro.org.br/biblioteca/enegep1998_art174.pdf

Bertram, D. (2007). Likert scales. Retrieved November, 2, 2013. Retrieved from http://my.ilstu.edu/~eostewa/497/Likert%20topic-dane-likert.pdf

Chang, P. L.; Hsu, W. S. (2002). Improving the Innovative Capabilities of Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industries with University-Industry Research Partnerships. The International Journal of advanced Manufacturing Technology, Londres, 19, 775-787.

Ergang, S., Godoy, L. P., Lorenzett, D. B., Godoy, T. P., Rizzatti, C. B., Guarienti, E. P. & Siluk, J. C. M. (2012). Qualidade dos serviços em uma rede educacional: Relação entre expectativa e percepção. Engevista, 14(3), 243-256.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development (pp. 14-19). New York: EASST.

Folha De São Paulo (2014). Ranking Universitário Folha 2014. Retrieved from http://ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2014/rankingdecursos/engenhariadeproducao/

IBGE – Instituto brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2015). PIB Cidades. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/painel/painel.php?codmun=313170#

Lorentzen, J. (2015). Local learning and international experiences in high education-industry relationships: Apples ando ranges?. In: Mitra, Jay; Edmondson, John. Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Exchange. New York: Routledge.

Luengo, M. J. & Obeso, M. (2013). El efecto de la triple hélice en los resultados de innovación. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(4), 388-399. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902013000400006

Madeira, L. M. M., Vick, T. E. & Nagano, M. S. (2013). Directions of scientific literature in knowledge management from the perspective of their relationships with innovation, information and technology management. Transinformação, 25(2), 167-174. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-37862013000200008

Malhotra, N. K. (2009). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Miguel, P.A.C. & HO, L. L (2010). Levantamento tipo Survey. In: Miguel, P.A.C.. (Org.). Metodologia de pesquisa em Engenharia de Produção e Gestão de Operações (pp. 5-29). Rio de Janeiro: Campus/Elsevier.

Robertson, S. & Verger, A. (2012). A origem das parcerias público-privada na governança global da educação. Educação & Sociedade, 33(121), 1133-1156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302012000400012

Tractenberg, R. E., Yumoto, F., Aisen, P. S., Kaye, J. A. & Mislevy, R. J. (2012). Using the Guttman Scale to Define and Estimate Measurement Error in Items over Time: The Case of Cognitive Decline and the Meaning of “Points Lost”. PloS ONE. Montreal, Canada, 7. Retrieved from http://search-ebscohostcom.ez38.periodicos.capes.gov.br/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=79995076 &lang=ptbr&site=ehost-live

World Bank Institute (2012). Public-Private Partnerships: Reference Guide. Washington, 1, 11. Retrieved from http://api.ning.com/files/Iumatxx-0jz3owSB05xZDkmWIE7GTVYA3cXwt4K4s3Uy0NtPPRgPWYO1lLrWaTUqybQeTXIeuSYUxbPFWlysuyNI5rL6b2Ms/PPPReferenceGuidev02Web.pdf

Downloads

Published

2018-06-06

How to Cite

Neves, I. F. M., D’Elboux, T. V., Neves, S. M., Paiva, E. J. de, & Pinto, J. A. (2018). Research opportunities in production engineering: a diagnosis instrument proposal / Oportunidades de pesquisa em engenharia de produção: uma proposta de instrumento de diagnóstico. Brazilian Journal of Development, 4(5), 1789–1808. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv4n5-214

Issue

Section

Original Papers