Indicators For Evaluating Overweight And Obesity Actions In Primary Care - A Scoping Review Protocol / Indicadores Para Avaliar Acções De Excesso De Peso E Obesidade Nos Cuidados Primários - Um Protocolo De Revisão Do Âmbito

Authors

  • Vanessa Fernandes Davies Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos, São José dos Pinhais, Paraná
  • Rafaela Souza
  • Daniela Alba Nickel
  • Josimari Telino de Lacerda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n2-307

Keywords:

primary care, overweight, obesity, indicators, evaluation.

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of health policies and actions allows us to measure the effectiveness of interventions and to suggest adjustments in order to achieve the desired outcome. Identifying indicators that reflect the different aspects of coping with overweight and obesity is a challenge for health evaluators, and shows the scope and relevance of the evaluative studies in the area. Aim:This article aims to present a protocol for a scoping review on the mapping of indicators used in primary care to monitor and evaluate actions for dealing with overweight and obesity. It is intended to answer the following questions: What are the indicators used to assess and monitor actions to deal with overweight and obesity in primary care? Are the indicators used able to assess and monitor the different components inherent in the recommended interventions to address overweight and obesity in primary care? Are the indicators used in line with the principles of primary care?

Methods:The protocol described here was based on the recommendations of the PRISMA EXTENSION FOR SCOPING REVIEWS - PRISMA -Scr and the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Expected Results: It is hoped that the results of the scoping review can contribute to the improvement of health evaluation related to overweight and obesity in primary care. In order to disseminate the results and make it possible to reach the actors involved with overweight and obesity, the results of the scoping review will be published in a scientific magazine and presented at conferences and other relevant events.

References

- Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. 2016. Food systems and diets: Facing the challenges of the 21st century. London, UK. http://glopan.org/sites/default/files/ForesightReport.pdf

- Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 [published correction appears in Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):746]. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766-781. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8

- Batis, C., Mazariegos, M., Martorell, R., Gil, A., & Rivera, J. (2020). Malnutrition in all its forms by wealth, education and ethnicity in Latin America: Who are more affected? Public Health Nutrition, 23(S1), S1-S12. doi:10.1017/S136898001900466X

- Stevens GA, Singh GM, Lu Y, Danaei G, Lin JK, Finucane MM, et al. National, regional, and global trends in adult overweight and obesity prevalences. Popul Health Metr. 2012;10(1):22.

- Kelly T, Yang W, Chen C-S, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes 2005. 2008 Sep;32(9):1431–7.

-Blüher, M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 15, 288–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8

-Soleymani T, Daniel S, Garvey WT. Weight maintenance: challenges, tools and strategies for primary care physicians. Obes Rev. 2016;17(1):81-93. doi:10.1111/obr.12322

-Dai H, Alsalhe TA, Chalghaf N, Riccò M, Bragazzi NL, Wu J. The global burden of disease attributable to high body mass index in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003198. Published 2020 Jul 28. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003198

-Lockhart SM, O'Rahilly S. When Two Pandemics Meet: Why Is Obesity Associated with Increased COVID-19 Mortality? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 29]. Med (N Y). 2020;10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.005. doi:10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.005

-Pan L, Sherry B, Park S, Blanck HM. The association of obesity and school absenteeism attributed to illness or injury among adolescents in the United States, 2009. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(1):64-69. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.003

- Apovian CM. Obesity: definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jun;22(7 Suppl):s176-85. PMID: 27356115.

-Nowrouzi B, McDougall A, Gohar B, Nowrouz-Kia B, Casole J, et al. (2015) Weight Bias in the Workplace: A Literature Review. Occup Med Health Aff 3:206. doi: 10.4172/2329-6879.1000206

-Sarwer DB, Polonsky HM. The Psychosocial Burden of Obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2016;45(3):677-688. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2016.04.016

- Starfield B. Atenção primária: equilíbrio entre necessidades de saúde, serviços e tecnologia. Brasília: UNESCO/Ministério da Saúde; 2002.

- George Bray, Michelle Look & Donna Ryan (2013) Treatment of the Obese Patient in Primary Care: Targeting and Meeting Goals and Expectations, Postgraduate Medicine, 125:5, 67-77, DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2013.09.2692

-Semlitsch, T, Stigler, FL, Jeitler, K, Horvath, K, Siebenhofer, A. Management of overweight and obesity in primary care—A systematic overview of international evidence?based guidelines. Obesity Reviews. 2019; 20: 1218– 1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12889

- Cochrane AJ, Dick B, King NA, Hills AP, Kavanagh DJ. Developing dimensions for a multicomponent multidisciplinary approach to obesity management: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):814.

-Tronieri JS, Wadden TA, Chao AM, Tsai AG. Primary Care Interventions for Obesity: Review of the Evidence. Curr Obes Rep. 2019;8(2):128-136. doi:10.1007/s13679-019-00341-5

-Durrer Schutz D, Busetto L, Dicker D, et al. European Practical and Patient-Centred Guidelines for Adult Obesity Management in Primary Care. Obes Facts. 2019;12(1):40-66. doi:10.1159/000496183

- Denford, S., Lakshman, R., Callaghan, M. et al. Improving public health evaluation: a qualitative investigation of practitioners' needs. BMC Public Health 18, 190 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5075-8

-Mitchell LJ, Ball LE, Ross LJ, Barnes KA, Williams LT. Effectiveness of Dietetic Consultations in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1941-1962. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.364. Epub 2017 Aug 19. PMID: 28826840.

-Stoto, M. and L. Cosler. “Evaluation Of Public Health Interventions.” (2007).Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Massachusetts

- Luig T, Anderson R, Sharma AM, Campbell-Scherer DL. Personalizing obesity assessment and care planning in primary care: patient experience and outcomes in everyday life and health. Clin Obes. 218;8(6):411-423. doi:10.1111/cob.12283

-Public Health England. Standard Evaluation Framework for Weight Management Interventions.2018

- McPherson ME, Mirkin R, Heatherley PN, Homer CJ. Educating health care professionals in advocacy for childhood obesity prevention in their communities: integrating public health and primary care in the Be Our Voice project. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(8):e37-e43. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300833

-Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(1):3-21. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x

- Henderson E. Obesity in primary care: a qualitative synthesis of patient and practitioner perspectives on roles and responsibilities. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(633):e240-e247. doi:10.3399/bjgp15X684397

- Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32.

- Decaria J, Sharp C, Petrella R. Scoping review report: obesity in older adults. Int J Obesity. 2012;36(9):1141-50.

- Crilly T, Jashapara A, Ferlie E. Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation: a scoping review of the literature. London: Department of Management, King’s College London; 2010.

- Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2015 edition/supplement - Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews.

-Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W e outros. Extensão PRISMA para revisões de escopo (PRISMA-ScR): lista de verificação e explicação. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169 : 467–473. [Epub antes da impressão, em 4 de setembro de 2018]. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

- Ritchie J & Lewis J. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Qualitative Research Practice – A Guide for Social Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications, 2003. p.220-262.

-NVivo software (version 10.0, 2012; QSR International, Doncaster, VIC, Australia)

Downloads

Published

2021-04-07

How to Cite

DAVIES, V. F.; SOUZA, R.; NICKEL, D. A.; DE LACERDA, J. T. Indicators For Evaluating Overweight And Obesity Actions In Primary Care - A Scoping Review Protocol / Indicadores Para Avaliar Acções De Excesso De Peso E Obesidade Nos Cuidados Primários - Um Protocolo De Revisão Do Âmbito. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 7706–7722, 2021. DOI: 10.34119/bjhrv4n2-307. Disponível em: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/27842. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2024.

Issue

Section

Original Papers