Percepção de empresas desenvolvedoras de software em relação à gestão de pessoas, aspectos humanos envolvidos e suas relações

Perception of software development companies in relation to people management, human aspects and their relationships

Authors

  • Patrícia Cristina Moser
  • Hermano Perrelli de Moura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38152/bjtv5n3-003

Keywords:

aspectos humanos, times de desenvolvimento, pessoas, desenvolvimento de software, modelos de maturidade

Abstract

Este trabalho tem como objetivo investigar a percepção de empresas desenvolvedoras de software em relação à gestão de pessoas e aspectos humanos observados. Foi realizado um estudo qualitativo com gestores de times de desenvolvimento. Os dados foram analisados ​​utilizando técnicas de codificação qualitativa e os resultados foram verificados e validados por meio da verificação de membros. Percebeu-se que os desafios para a gestão são muitos, e que além de questões técnicas, as relacionadas ao desenvolvimento do colaborador são consideradas, tais como criatividade, responsabilidade, motivação, valores pessoais, inteligência emocional, capacidade de aprendizagem, liderança, comunicação, personalidade, comportamento, proatividade, trabalho em equipe. Uma ferramenta para ajudar nessa gestão, que forneça orientação sobre pontos considerados importantes, pode ser um ponto positivo.  

References

AGHINA, W. et al. How to select and develop individuals for successful agile teams: A practical guide. 2019.

BAKER, F. T. Chief programmer team management of production programming. IBM Systems Journal, v. 11, n. 1, p. 56–73, 5 abr. 1972.

BECK., K. Extreme programming explained. 2. ed. [s.l.] Embrace Change, 2004.

BROOKS JR, F. The mythical man-month: essays on software engineering. 1995.

CANNON-BOWERS, J. A.; BOWERS, C. Team development and functioning. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 1: Building and developing the organization., p. 597–650, 8 jun. 2010.

CAPRETZ, L. F.; AHMED, F. Making sense of software development and personality types. IT Professional, v. 12, n. 1, p. 6–13, jan. 2010.

CAPRETZ, L. F.; AHMED, F.; DA SILVA, F. Q. B. Soft Sides of Software. Information and Software Technology, v. 92, p. 92–94, 21 nov. 2017.

CHEN, Y. C.; WANG, Y. J. Application and development of the people capability maturity model level of an organisation. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, v. 29, n. 3–4, p. 329–345, 23 fev. 2018.

CHOW, T.; CAO, D. B. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 81, n. 6, p. 961–971, 1 jun. 2008.

CHRISSIS, M. B. et al. CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integrationand Product, p. 752, 2006.

CMMI Institute. Disponível em: <https://cmmiinstitute.com/resource-files/public/cmmi-adoption-trends-2019-mid-year-update>. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2022a.

COCKBURN, A.; HIGHSMITH, J. Agile software development, the people factor. ieeexplore.ieee.org, 2001.

CURTIS, BILL HEFLEY, BILL MILLER, S. People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0, Second Edition, 2009. [s.l: s.n.].

CURTIS, B.; HEFLEY, I.; MILLER, S. Capability Maturity Model®(P±CMM®). 2001.

DE O. MELO, C. et al. The evolution of agile software development in Brazil: Education, research, and the state-of-the-practice. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, v. 19, n. 4, p. 523–552, 1 nov. 2013.

DEMARCO, T.; LISTER, T. Peopleware: Productive projects and teams. In: New York: Dorset House Publishing Co, 1999.

FARAJ, S.; SPROULL, L. Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072, v. 46, n. 12, p. 1554–1568, 1 dez. 2000.

FONTANA, R. et al. Progressive Outcomes: A framework for maturing in agile software development. Elsevier, 2015.

GIL, A. C. Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. 5. ed. São Paulo. 2010.

HARPER, M.; COLE, P. Member checking: Can benefits be gained similar to group therapy. , 17(2), 510-517. The qualitative report, v. 17, n. 2, p. 510–517, 2012.

HERMANTO, S.; KABURUAN, E. R.; LEGOWO, N. Gamified SCRUM Design in Software Development Projects. In 2018 International Conference on Orange Technologies (ICOT). Anais...2018.

HIGHSMITH, J.; HIGHSMITH, J. Agile software development ecosystems. 2002.

LETTICE, F.; MCCRACKEN, M. Team performance management: A review and look forward. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, v. 13, p. 148–159, 28 ago. 2007.

MANZINI, E. J. A entrevista na pesquisa social. n. 26, p. 149–158, 1990.

MARUPING, L. M.; ZHANG, X.; VENKATESH, V. Role of collective ownership and coding standards in coordinating expertise in software project teams. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 18, n. 4, p. 355–371, 2009.

MERRIAM, S. B. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. 2009.

MOE, N. B.; DINGSØYR, T. Scrum and team effectiveness: Theory and practice. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, v. 9 LNBIP, p. 11–20, 2008.

MOE, N.; DINGSØYR, T.; DYBÅ, T. A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project. Information and Software Technology, 2010.

MOSER, P. C.; DE MOURA, H. P. Maturity Models for Managing People in Software Development Teams: A Systematic Literature Review. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, v. 12, n. 14, p. 8–30, 2022.

MOURMANT, G.; GALLIVAN, M. How personality type influences decision paths in the unfolding model of voluntary job turnover: An application to IS professionals. SIGMIS-CPR 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference: The Global Information Technology Workforce. Anais...Association for Computing Machinery, 2007.

OLIVEIRA, R.; FRANÇA, C. Agile practices and motivation: A quantitative study with Brazilian software developers. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Anais...Association for Computing Machinery, 15 abr. 2019. Disponível em: <https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3319008.3319714>. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2022

OLIVEIRA, S. L. Sociologia das organizações: uma análise do homem e das empresas no ambiente competitivo. São Paulo. 2011.: [s.n.].

PACKLICK, J. The agile maturity map a goal oriented approach to agile improvement. Proceedings - AGILE 2007, p. 266–271, 2007.

PATEL, C.; RAMACHANDRAN, M. Agile maturity model (AMM): A Soware Process Improvement framework for agile soware development practices. International Journal of Software Engineering, v. 2(1), p. 3- 28., 2009.

PIKKARAINEN, M. et al. The impact of agile practices on communication in software development. Empirical Software Engineering, v. 13, n. 3, p. 303–337, 23 jun. 2008.

PIRZADEH, L. Human factors in software development: a systematic literature review. 2010.

PRIKLADNICKI, R.; WILLI, R.; MILANI, F. Métodos ágeis para desenvolvimento de software. 2014.

REA, L. M. Metodologia de Pesquisa-do planejamento a execução. 2000.

SHARP, H.; ROBINSON, H. Three ’C’s of agile practice: Collaboration, co-ordination and communication. Agile Software Development: Current Research and Future Directions, p. 61–85, 2010.

SILVA, R. C. C. Um estudo sobre a influência de fatores humanos e culturais em projetos de desenvolvimento de software ágeis. 2017.

SOFTEX. Melhoria de Processo do Software Brasileiro - Guia Geral MPS de Gestão de Pessoas - MR-MPS-RH (2014). [s.l: s.n.].

TESSEM, B.; MAURER, F. Job satisfaction and motivation in a large agile team. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), v. 4536 LNCS, p. 54–61, 2007.

TRIVIÑOS, A. Introdução às ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. São Paulo. 1987.

VIANA, D. et al. The influence of human aspects on software process improvement: Qualitative research findings and comparison to previous studies. IET Seminar Digest, v. 2012, n. 1, p. 121–125, 2012.

WHITE, K. B. MIS project teams: An investigation of cognitive style implications. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, v. 8, n. 2, p. 95–101, 1984.

Published

2022-09-10

Issue

Section

Artigos originais